The IM Bootcamp Day 3

The hospital machine:
levels of care, discharge, codes, and death

Nobody explains the building. Interns learn the medicine and then discover, one confusing afternoon at a time, that the hospital itself is a machine with rules: patients move between levels of care by criteria nobody taught, discharges to “rehab” live or die on paperwork, codes have an anatomy, and a death sets off a sequence of calls and forms that every intern eventually runs alone at 3 a.m. This session explains the machine once, before the afternoon that teaches it the hard way.

Format case + systems walkthrough Time 90 minutes Leader chief resident + faculty Group 6–8 interns Competencies systems-based practice

Why this session

The clinical sessions of this bootcamp teach what to do for the patient; this one teaches how the building responds. The machinery matters because it is where good clinical decisions go to stall: the right escalation delayed because nobody knew what step-down could actually do, the ready-for-rehab patient stuck three extra days because the therapy evaluation was ordered late, the readmission seeded by a discharge summary that never said which medications changed. And two of the machine’s events — the code and the death — arrive with no warning and run on protocols an intern should have walked through once in daylight.

What interns leave able to do

  1. Explain what actually defines a level of care — monitoring, nursing intensity, and permitted therapies — and run an up-transfer or down-transfer through the right people.
  2. Distinguish subacute rehabilitation from long-term nursing-home care, and name the steps that actually get a patient placed.
  3. Write a discharge summary that protects the next clinician — and hold the discharge conversation that protects the patient.
  4. Describe what happens during an in-hospital code: who comes, who runs it, and what the intern’s real jobs are.
  5. Run the sequence when a patient dies: pronouncement, notifications in order, the required referrals, and the paperwork.

Two admissions

One night on call, two admissions. Their hospitalizations diverge — and together they tour the whole machine. Disclosed in parts; commit before each reveal.

Part 1 — Mr. A, moving up

The ED calls at 9 p.m. about Mr. A, 71, with pneumonia and a heart-failure history: “borderline — we could do observation, or you could admit him.” You admit him to the floor. By 4 a.m. his oxygen requirement has doubled and his pressure is drifting; the nurse asks, “should he be up a level?” You realize you are not entirely sure what step-down offers that the floor doesn’t — or what would make him an ICU patient instead.

Observation versus inpatient — what actually turned on that decision? And at 4 a.m.: floor, step-down, or ICU — on what criteria, arranged through whom?

Part 2 — Mr. A, coming down and going out

Day 5. Mr. A escalated to the ICU, turned the corner, and stepped back down; he is now on the floor, deconditioned but improving. He lives alone, second floor, no elevator. Physical therapy writes: “unable to return home safely at current level of function — recommend subacute rehabilitation.” His daughter hears “rehab” and asks, alarmed, whether you are “putting him in a nursing home.” The case manager asks if your discharge summary will be done by noon — the facility won’t accept without it.

What is the difference between what PT recommended and what the daughter fears? What has to happen — and in what order — for him to actually get a bed? And what belongs in that discharge summary and in your last conversation with him?

Part 3 — Ms. B, the other ending

Your second admission that night was Ms. B, 84, with metastatic cancer and a new pneumonia, full code after a rushed ED conversation. On day 2, the overhead call is for her room. The code runs eleven minutes; circulation returns; she goes to the ICU. On day 4 — after a family meeting changes her code status to comfort-focused — she dies at 2:40 a.m. with her son at the bedside. The nurse pages you: “Can you come pronounce her?”

You have never done this. You do not know what to examine, what to write, who to call first, or what happens to her now.

Walk both events: what actually happened during those eleven minutes — who was in the room and what was the intern’s job? And now, at 2:40 a.m.: the pronouncement, the calls in order, the paperwork, and what you say to her son.

Levels of care — what the floors actually mean

A level of care is not a place; it is a package of monitoring, nursing intensity, and permitted therapies. The floor means intermittent vitals and a nurse covering several patients. Step-down (intermediate care) means continuous monitoring, closer nursing ratios, and some therapies the floor cannot run. The ICU means continuous everything, one-to-one or one-to-two nursing, and the full menu — ventilators, titratable drips, invasive monitoring. The practical intern question at any bedside is therefore never “which floor?” but “what does this patient need in the next twelve hours that the current level cannot deliver?” — a q1h neuro check, a drip the floor can’t titrate, a nurse who can watch one patient instead of five. Exact capabilities are hospital-specific: learn your building’s menu in week one, because escalation decisions run on it.

Observation versus inpatient admission is a different axis entirely — a billing status, not a bed: observation is meant for short stays expected to resolve quickly, and the status can ride with the patient regardless of which unit they sleep on. It has real downstream consequences — for what the patient owes, and in some insurance situations for what is covered after the hospital, including rehab eligibility — which is why case management tracks it so closely. The intern’s job is not to memorize payer rules; it is to know the distinction exists, answer the ED’s question on clinical expected-course grounds, and loop in case management when status questions surface.

Moving a patient is a conversation, not an order. Up-transfers: the receiving team evaluates (that is what a rapid response or an ICU consult is), the accepting attending accepts, and a real handoff travels with the patient — the handoff session’s structure, compressed and urgent. Down-transfers are the same machinery in reverse, plus the trap nobody names: the step-down from the ICU is a handoff to a team that has never met the patient — the sign-out, the medication reconciliation (drips converted, home medications resumed or deliberately not), and the contingency plans matter more here than anywhere. And notify your attending of any level-of-care change — it sits on the consult session’s never-hesitate list for a reason.

Discharge — the destination, the summary, the conversation

What the daughter feared versus what PT recommended. The words matter because families hear them differently: subacute rehabilitation is a short-term, goal-directed stay — daily therapy and skilled nursing aimed at getting a patient home, typically covered as a skilled benefit after a qualifying hospitalization. A nursing home in the long-term sense is custodial living — help with daily life, indefinitely, financed differently (largely private funds and Medicaid, not the skilled benefit). The same building often houses both, which is exactly why the daughter panicked. The sentence that defuses it: “This is rehab with a discharge date — the goal is home, stronger, in a few weeks.”

How placement actually happens — and where interns stall it: (1) therapy evaluations ordered early — PT/OT recommendations are the evidence everything else runs on, so the eval ordered on day 2 beats the one ordered the morning of discharge; (2) case management runs the referrals to facilities the insurance will authorize and the family can visit; (3) the facility accepts — based on the clinical picture your documentation paints; (4) the paperwork travels: the discharge summary, the medication orders, the pending items. The facility can only give the medications on your orders — a missed anticoagulant on the transfer list is a real event, not a clerical one. This is the time-management session’s “discharges are morning work,” with the machinery shown.

The discharge summary is the final handoff — written to a clinician who has never met the patient and cannot page you. A correct one carries: admission and discharge diagnoses · the hospital course, by problem, in plain prose · procedures · the medication list with every change flagged — started, stopped, dose-changed, and why · pending results with a named owner · follow-up appointments with dates · functional status and disposition · and the if/then contingencies (the handoff session’s test: could a stranger act on this?). Write it the day of discharge at the latest — same-day summaries are more accurate and they unlock placements, as Mr. A’s case manager just demonstrated.

And the conversation before the door. The discharge conversation is the last, best chance to prevent the readmission: what happened, in the patient’s words back to you (teach-back — “tell me how you’ll take the new blood thinner”); which medications changed and which stopped; the red flags that mean call or return, named specifically; the follow-ups made, not suggested; and who to call with questions before the first appointment. Ten unhurried minutes — and if the patient goes to a facility instead of home, the same conversation happens anyway, because patients transferred to rehab deserve to know their own story.

Anatomy of a code

The rapid-response session taught the five minutes before the code team arrives. This is what happens when the overhead call goes out: a trained team converges — composition varies by hospital but typically ICU or senior physicians, ICU nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy, anesthesia or airway coverage — and one person runs it. A good code is quiet: the leader stands back, assigns roles, and speaks in closed loops; compressions rotate every two minutes; the recorder tracks rhythm checks, doses, and times; the algorithm does the deciding.

The intern’s real jobs, in rough order of likelihood: high-quality compressions in the rotation · the recorder’s clipboard · the information courier — you may know the patient better than anyone in the room, and the history, code status, potassium, and last events are your contribution · procedures and airway, almost never. Two more roles nobody assigns but someone must own: the family — many hospitals support family presence during resuscitation with a staff member dedicated to them; if the family is in the hallway, someone updates them in plain language — and, after, the aftermath: the event documented with times, the attending called (a code on their patient is a never-hesitate call), the team debriefed even for two minutes, and the room — including you — allowed to be human about it. If the code does not end with return of circulation, it ends in the next section’s sequence.

When a patient dies — the sequence

Every intern runs this alone eventually, usually at night. Walk it once now.

  1. Pronouncement. Confirm identity. Examine: no response to voice or stimulation, no respirations, no heart sounds or pulse over a full observation period, pupils fixed. Note the time — that is the time of death. If the family is present, examine gently and narrate softly; the exam can be done with dignity in front of a son.
  2. The people at the bedside first. A brief, plain sentence to the family in the room: “She has died. I’m so sorry.” Then presence over paperwork for a few minutes — the serious-news session’s skills, at their most final. Chaplaincy exists at any hour; offer it.
  3. Notifications, in order: your attending — always, at any hour; a death is on the never-hesitate list without exception. Family not present gets called — who calls and what is said is worth thirty seconds of alignment with your attending first, and “died” is the word: euphemisms on the phone create cruel confusion. Then the hospital’s own machinery per protocol — nursing supervisor or admitting office — which sets bed, belongings, and funeral-home logistics in motion.
  4. The medical examiner screen. Some deaths must be reported before anything else moves: unexpected deaths, deaths within a defined window of admission or a procedure, falls, trauma, suspected non-natural causes — the trigger list is jurisdiction-specific; know your hospital’s. When the medical examiner takes a case, lines and tubes stay in place.
  5. The organ-procurement referral — every death, no exceptions, not your judgment call. Federal hospital conditions of participation require notification of the organ procurement organization for “individuals whose death is imminent or who have died in the hospital,” and the OPO — not the team — determines suitability for donation.1 In practice the call is routine, usually made by nursing per protocol — your job is to know it must happen and never to pre-empt it by deciding for the OPO. Donation conversations themselves are run by trained requestors, not by the intern at 2:40 a.m.
  6. The paperwork. The death note: time of pronouncement, the examination performed, who was present, who was notified, medical-examiner and OPO referral status. The death certificate follows — who completes which parts, and how cause-of-death lines are worded, is governed by your state and hospital; ask rather than guess, because certificates done wrong bounce back and delay families. An autopsy offer, where appropriate, is the attending’s conversation to lead.
  7. Afterward — you. A death you pronounced at 2:40 stays with you at 3:15. The error session’s rule applies even when nothing went wrong: tell someone. The best programs debrief deaths; the best interns let them.

Key teaching points

  1. A level of care is a package — monitoring, nursing, therapies — not a place. Ask what the patient needs that the current level can’t deliver.
  2. Observation versus inpatient is a billing status with real downstream consequences. Know it exists; loop in case management.
  3. Subacute rehab is a bridge home; a nursing home is a residence. Say the difference out loud to families — and order the therapy evals early, because placement runs on them.
  4. The discharge summary is the final handoff, and the discharge conversation is readmission prevention. Same-day summaries; medication changes flagged with reasons; teach-back at the door.
  5. A code has an anatomy: one leader, closed loops, rotating compressions, a recorder — and the intern’s jobs are compressions, the clipboard, and the patient’s story.
  6. A death has a sequence: pronounce → family → attending (always) → protocol notifications → medical-examiner screen → OPO referral (every death; their call, not yours) → paperwork → and then someone checks on you.

Pocket card

Carry this
  • Level of care = monitoring + nursing + therapies. “What can’t this level deliver?”
  • Transfers are conversations: receiving team + accepting attending + a real handoff.
  • Subacute rehab = home, stronger, with a discharge date. Order PT/OT early.
  • Discharge summary same-day: med changes + why, pendings + owner, if/thens.
  • Teach-back at the door: meds, red flags, follow-ups made.
  • Death: pronounce · family · attending always · ME screen · OPO every time · paperwork · then you.

Variations

  • The against-the-clock version: give Part 2 a 2 p.m. facility-transport deadline and run the morning as a sequencing exercise — the time-management session’s whiteboard, applied to a discharge.
  • The medical-examiner version: change Ms. B’s death to an unexpected one on the floor — now the ME screen leads the sequence, and lines and devices stay in until the medical examiner answers — per your ME’s local rules. Debrief what changes and why.
  • The walk-the-building version: run the levels-of-care block as an actual walk — floor, step-down, ICU — with a charge nurse at each stop explaining what their unit can and cannot do. The highest-retention variant by far.

Notes

Both patients are fictional composites. The organ-procurement referral requirement is quoted from the federal hospital conditions of participation.1 The evidence for the bootcamp’s design is in the introduction.

Sources

  1. Condition of participation: Organ, tissue, and eye procurement, 42 C.F.R. § 482.45 (2026). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/chapter-IV/subchapter-G/part-482/subpart-C/section-482.45 1 2

This page is a teaching scenario for facilitated small-group education. Every patient in it is fictional. It is not clinical or legal guidance: pronouncement requirements, medical-examiner criteria, death-certificate processes, transfer protocols, and post-acute coverage rules vary by state, payer, and institution — localize against your hospital’s policies before teaching. Last reviewed July 2026.

The IM Bootcamp

See the full curriculum

Open the bootcamp hub